The engagement
Find the risks hiding between your project documents.
The Development Risk Audit is a fixed-scope assessment of a single project. We read your documents together — not separately — and return what conflicts, what's missing, and what to do about it.
What you receive
Eleven deliverables, one report
- 01Executive Risk Summary
- 02Critical Risk Register
- 03Cross-Document Reconciliation
- 04Critical Path Analysis
- 05Power / Utility Assessment
- 06Permitting Assessment
- 07Water Assessment
- 08Incentive / Tax Assessment
- 09Information Gaps
- 10Recommended Actions
- 11Source-linked evidence for every finding
What you provide
Documents you already have
- Project documents
- Master schedule
- Utility information
- Permits
- Water information
- Incentives
- Relevant financial assumptions
- Procurement information
- Other relevant development materials
You don't need to assemble hundreds of documents. We scope the exact set with you before beginning, and start with whatever you're comfortable sharing.
Representative output
The top of a typical risk register
Utility / Energization Conflict
Power availability in the utility agreement postdates the energization date in the master schedule by three months.
Evidence · Impact · Recommendation · Confidence — each with source & page
Long-Lead Equipment Risk
Transformer delivery is scheduled after planned energization. Order date has not been confirmed against the construction sequence.
Evidence · Impact · Recommendation · Confidence — each with source & page
Incentive Exposure
Forecast eligible capex falls below the incentive threshold. Shortfall quantified against the agreement's compliance window.
Evidence · Impact · Recommendation · Confidence — each with source & page
Permit Risk
A required permit shows submitted-not-approved, with a condition that affects the water workstream's timeline.
Evidence · Impact · Recommendation · Confidence — each with source & page
Customer Commitment Risk
Contracted delivery date assumes an energization milestone that two other documents contradict.
Evidence · Impact · Recommendation · Confidence — each with source & page
Illustrative examples based on a representative 300 MW campus engagement.
Timeline
10–14 days
Business days from receipt of the scoped document set.
Format
Report + live review
We present findings on a call and walk through what's material — we never just send a PDF.
After the audit
Continuous monitoring
The audit is a baseline. We can keep it updated as project information changes.