Development intelligence

The intelligence layer for data-center development.

We connect project documents, schedules, power, permitting and development dependencies to identify risks before they become expensive problems.

The problem

The information exists. It's just in different places.

On a large data-center project, the utility agreement, the master schedule, the procurement plan and the incentive paperwork are all maintained by different people, in different systems. Each one is internally consistent. Together, they often aren't.

The risks that become expensive are rarely inside a single document. They hide between documents — in the dates, thresholds and dependencies that don't reconcile.

Powercritical

Utility agreement: September 2029

vs. Master schedule: June 2029

Procurementcritical

Transformer delivery: August 2029

vs. Energization: June 2029

Incentiveshigh

Threshold: $500M eligible capex

vs. Current forecast: $462M

Illustrative conflicts from a representative 300 MW campus audit.

Coverage

Every workstream. One reconciled picture.

01

Power & interconnection

02

Permitting

03

Water

04

Incentives & tax

05

Procurement

06

Construction

07

Schedules

08

Customer commitments

We don't replace your existing project-management software. We connect the information inside it — and inside everything around it.

Who it's for

For the team that has to answer for the project.

We work with the people who own a data-center development from land and power through to energization — the ones who are asked what changed, what it affects, and what happens next.

Data-center and colocation developers

You're running more than one campus at once, and every new site adds another utility queue, permit tracker and incentive agreement to reconcile.

AI infrastructure companies

Power, water and incentives have to line up before energization — and the schedule is set by hardware, not by paperwork.

Developers entering data centers

You know real estate and capital. You don't yet know which of these documents quietly disagree with each other.

The sweet spot

Project size
50–500+ MW
Stage
Active development, pre-energization
Moving pieces
Consultants, utilities, permits, incentives

Who usually brings us in

Chief Development Officer · VP Development · Head of Development · COO · CFO

Infrastructure funds and investment platforms — we're not built for you yet. We work with teams that have an active project and the documents to show for it.

The engagement

Development Risk Audit

A fixed-scope assessment of one project. You share the documents you already have — schedules, utility information, permits, water, incentives, procurement. We return an executive risk assessment with source-linked evidence, cross-document conflicts, critical-path issues, information gaps and recommended actions.

See the full deliverable →
Timeline
10–14 business days
Deliverable
Executive risk report, presented live
Evidence
Every finding linked to source & page

What changed? What does it affect? What should you do next?

If you're developing a large data-center project, we'll show you what your documents say when they're read together.

Request a Development Risk Audit